I have to vent here.
http://ift.tt/1Kohm2Z
Like really?! What part of that looks "classic". NONE OF IT!!!! Why did you get rid of the chrome looking eyelets for the laces? Why are the laces for the black ones not WHITE like they SHOULD be? Where are the two racing stripes on the sole and the upper!?!
They have the nerve to call those "classic" chuck taylors?! I'm all for giving them a technological advancement, but to completely deface what has stood for 98 YEARS?! Something as American as white shirts, jeans and a leather jacket'ed guy eating apple pie while shooting off fireworks from the back of his 59 coupe deville?!
Why does everything have to pander to the ghetto fabulous people in society? Why change what was an iconic image in the name of "fashion" and to sell more to your hippy hop crowd?!
These things are so far from greaser perfection that it makes me want to throw up my intestines. I understand they needed an upgrade, but UPGRADE DOES NOT MEAN CHANGE THE WHOLE DAMN THING AND HAVE THE NERVE TO CALL IT A CLASSIC!!!!!!!!!!QKEULHGW4IULHFILUWEHFKEQUWGF87QW4 YR748302QR8QWOEIHJQR~!!!!
Get this, Chukkies have been going up in price and currently sit at 55 a pair after taxes and all, the shoes them selves fall apart after a year and a half....They cost 75 for high tops......75 FOR HIGH TOPS! this is the shoe young kids all the way through college wear. Like come on!
I'm so mad about this, everything is trying to change anything iconic. Stop trying to futurize EVERYTHING...Some of us like to wear a product that has been unchanged (in looks) for nearly a century, we like it, that's why it has been selling so greatly for nearly a century.
I dunno, I'm done with this. I wonder what's next, denim jeans made out elastic?:angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry: :angry::angry::angry::angry::angry:
http://ift.tt/1Kohm2Z
Like really?! What part of that looks "classic". NONE OF IT!!!! Why did you get rid of the chrome looking eyelets for the laces? Why are the laces for the black ones not WHITE like they SHOULD be? Where are the two racing stripes on the sole and the upper!?!
They have the nerve to call those "classic" chuck taylors?! I'm all for giving them a technological advancement, but to completely deface what has stood for 98 YEARS?! Something as American as white shirts, jeans and a leather jacket'ed guy eating apple pie while shooting off fireworks from the back of his 59 coupe deville?!
Why does everything have to pander to the ghetto fabulous people in society? Why change what was an iconic image in the name of "fashion" and to sell more to your hippy hop crowd?!
These things are so far from greaser perfection that it makes me want to throw up my intestines. I understand they needed an upgrade, but UPGRADE DOES NOT MEAN CHANGE THE WHOLE DAMN THING AND HAVE THE NERVE TO CALL IT A CLASSIC!!!!!!!!!!QKEULHGW4IULHFILUWEHFKEQUWGF87QW4 YR748302QR8QWOEIHJQR~!!!!
Get this, Chukkies have been going up in price and currently sit at 55 a pair after taxes and all, the shoes them selves fall apart after a year and a half....They cost 75 for high tops......75 FOR HIGH TOPS! this is the shoe young kids all the way through college wear. Like come on!
I'm so mad about this, everything is trying to change anything iconic. Stop trying to futurize EVERYTHING...Some of us like to wear a product that has been unchanged (in looks) for nearly a century, we like it, that's why it has been selling so greatly for nearly a century.
I dunno, I'm done with this. I wonder what's next, denim jeans made out elastic?:angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry: :angry::angry::angry::angry::angry:
New Chuck Taylors, Absolutely P-O! >
شارك عبر الماسنجر
